2011年6月3日

美國房價 跌回10年前水準 Real House Prices : Back to 1999 //About 28.4% of US homeowners owe more on the mortgage than their house is worth

About 28.4% of US homeowners owe more on the mortgage than 
their house is worth, real estate data firm Zillow said this month.

美國房價 跌回10年前水準
【編譯組/綜合報導】
June 01, 2011 03:29 PM | 20652 次 | 11 11 評論 | 25 25 推薦 | 電郵給朋友 | 打印
在法拍屋充斥、待售房屋眾多以及人們缺乏意願或者沒能力購屋等諸多因素下,全美3月份房價大幅下跌,使美國房價倒退10年,跌回2002年的水準,凸顯房市仍然在困境中掙扎。
美國標準普爾公布的調查報告指出,繼去年最後一季美國房價下跌3.6%之後,今年首季繼續下跌4.2%,調查指出,今年3月美國前20大城市中,有19個城市房價比1年前下跌。其中跌幅最深的是明尼阿波利斯,達10%。其次是鳳凰城下跌8.4%,芝加哥7.6%,西雅圖7.5%,坦帕6.9%,夏洛特6.8%,克里夫蘭6.3%,邁阿密6.1%。唯一上漲的是底特律,比去年上漲0.8%。經濟學家預估,年底前至少還會再下跌5%。
據該調查,全美房價指數已連續第八個月下跌,從房市泡沫以來的房價跌勢更甚經濟大蕭條時期,而在經濟大蕭條時期過後,房市大約花了19年才真正恢復元氣。
去年夏季在政府鼓勵購屋的稅賦優惠下,房價暫時反彈回升,但從優惠方案退場後又開始跌價。最新報告顯示,全美多數地區房價已經「二次衰退」。經通貨膨脹因素調整後,房價指數更跌至1999年以來最低紀錄。


Read more:世界新聞網-北美華文新聞、華商資訊 - 美國房價 跌回10年前水準






3月房價大跌 專家:年底前再跌5%
美聯社紐約31日電
June 01, 2011

在法拍屋充斥、待售房屋眾多以及人們缺乏意願或者沒能力購屋等諸多因素下,全美3月份房價大幅下跌,為自從2002年來的低點,凸顯房市仍然在困境中掙扎。
史坦普/席勒20都會區房價指數顯示,全美大都會區房價指數跌至九年新低,20個都會區中,多達18區3月份房價下跌,而且其中12個地區的房價跌至2006年房市泡沫化以來最低點。經濟學家預估,年底前至少還會再下跌5%。
目前共有12個都會區房價跌至將近四年新低,包括紐約、明尼亞波利斯、亞特蘭大、芝加哥、底特律、拉斯維加斯、邁阿密、鳳凰城等;其中,明尼亞波利斯市情況最糟糕,房價下跌3.7%,其次依序是夏洛特和芝加哥2.4%、底特律2%。有些地區不跌反漲,包括西雅圖上漲0.1%、華盛頓地區1.1%。華盛頓地區是過去一年中,房價唯一上升的大都會。
據該調查,全美房價指數已連續第八個月下跌,從房市泡沫以來的房價跌勢更甚經濟大蕭條時期,而在經濟大蕭條時期過後,房市大約花了19年才真正復元。
去年夏季在政府鼓勵購屋的稅賦優惠下,房價暫時反彈回升,但從優惠方案退場後又開始跌價。史坦普公司指數委員會主席貝里茲認為,最新報告顯示,全美多數地區房價已經「二次衰退」。經通貨膨脹因素調整後,房價指數更跌至1999年以來最低紀錄。
許多經濟學家認為,全美房價年底前至少還會再下跌5%,在待售法拍屋存量減少、雇主開始更大量的召募員工、銀行放寬借貸門檻以及潛在房屋買主有信心認為購屋是明智的投資之前,房價不太可能停止下跌。
富國銀行(Wells Fargo)資深經濟學家威奈爾說,人們取得房貸困難重重,也許明年初房價才會落底。


Read more:世界新聞網-北美華文新聞、華商資訊 - 3月房價大跌 專家:年底前再跌5




Real House Prices and Price-to-Rent: Back to 1999

by CalculatedRisk on 5/31/2011 12:35:00 PM
Case-Shiller, CoreLogic and others report nominal houseprices. However it is also useful to look at house prices in real terms (adjusted for inflation), as a price-to-rent ratio, and also price-to-income (not shown here).
Below are three graphs showing nominal prices (as reported), real prices and a price-to-rent ratio. Real prices are back to 1999/2000 levels, and the price-to-rent ratio is also back to 1999/2000 levels.
Nominal House Prices
The first graph shows the quarterly Case-Shiller National Index SA (through Q1 2011), and the monthly Case-Shiller Composite 20 SA (through March) and CoreLogic House Price Indexes (through March) in nominal terms (as reported).
Nominal House PricesClick on graph for larger image in graph gallery.
In nominal terms, the Case-Shiller National index is back to Q3 2002 levels, the Case-Shiller Composite 20 Index (SA) is slightly above the May 2009 lows (and close to June 2003 levels), and the CoreLogic index is back to January 2003.
Note: The not seasonally adjusted Case-Shiller Composite 20 Index (NSA) is back to April 2003 levels.
Real House Prices
Real House PricesThe second graph shows the same three indexes in real terms (adjusted for inflation using CPI less Shelter). Note: some people use other inflation measures to adjust for real prices.
In real terms, the National index is back to Q4 1999 levels, the Composite 20 index is back to October 2000, and the CoreLogic index back to November 1999.
A few key points:
• In real terms, all appreciation in the last decade is gone.
• Real prices are still too high, but they are much closer to the eventual bottom than the top in 2005. This isn’t like in 2005 when prices were way out of the normal range. In many areas – with an increasing population and land constraints – there is an upward slope to real prices (see: The upward slope of Real House Prices)
Price-to-Rent
In October 2004, Fed economist John Krainer and researcher Chishen Wei wrote a Fed letter on price to rent ratios: House Prices and Fundamental Value. Kainer and Wei presented a price-to-rent ratio using the OFHEO house price index and the Owners’ Equivalent Rent (OER) from the BLS.
Price-to-Rent RatioHere is a similar graph using the Case-Shiller Composite 20 and CoreLogic House Price Index (through March).
This graph shows the price to rent ratio (January 1998 = 1.0).
Note: the measure of Owners’ Equivalent Rent (OER) was mostly flat for two years – so the price-to-rent ratio mostly followed changes in nominalhouse prices. In recent months, OER has been increasing – lowering the price-to-rent ratio.
On a price-to-rent basis, the Composite 20 index is back to October 2000 levels, and the CoreLogic index is back to December 1999.

Fall in house prices raises fears for US economy

• Recovery hit by drop in consumer confidence
• US house prices back to 2002 levels
US house prices have fallen for the eighth month in a row. Photograph: Robert Galbraith /Reuters
US house prices have fallen back to levels last seen in 2002 and consumer confidence has also fallen sharply according to new figures, leading to fresh fears about the country's economic recovery.
A closely watched measure of the property market, Standard & Poor's Case-Shiller home price index, has fallen for eight months in a row and declined by 4.2% in the first quarter of 2011, following a 3.6% fall in the fourth quarter of 2010.
By the end of March the index hit a recession low and showed an annual decline of 5.1% compared with the first quarter of 2010.
According to the survey, nationally home prices are back to their mid-2002 levels. Prices in Atlanta, Cleveland, Detroit and Las Vegas are below January 2000 levels.
The US economy had been showing a better than forecast recovery but the Conference Board, an industry group, said its index of consumer attitudes fell to 60.8 in May from a revised 66.0 in April, well below economists' forecasts for 66.5. A third survey also suggested that growth could be slowing.
Ken Goldstein, Conference Board economist, said the figures were evidence that consumers were worried about jobs, food prices and housing. "These are not good numbers, we are back to where we were two month ago. But I think we are bobbing along the waves, not sinking further."
Business activity in the heartland mid-west grew much less than expected last month as sales and employment weakened. The Institute for Supply Management-Chicago business barometer dropped to 56.6 in May, its lowest reading since November 2009. The reading was 67.6 in April, and economists had forecast a May reading of 62.6.
"The question is, 'Is the softer data we're seeing transitory, or is it likely to persist throughout the remainder of 2011?' Right now, that's an open question that investors are trying to figure out," said Michael Sheldon, chief market strategist at RDM Financial in Westport, Connecticut.
Prices of single-family houses in the 20 largest US cities fell 0.2% from February to March on a seasonally adjusted basis, according to the Case-Shiller index. Year on year house prices fell in 19 of the 20 big cities polled by Case Shiller when compared with March 2010.
Minneapolis saw a 10% annual decline, the first market to experience a double digit drop since March 2010 when Las Vegas was down 12% on an annual basis.
Washington DC was the only city where home prices increased. Housing in the capital was up 1.1% on a monthly basis and 4.3% over the year. Seattle was up a modest 0.1% for the month, but still down 7.5% against March 2010.
About 28.4% of US homeowners owe more on the mortgage than their house is worth, real estate data firm Zillow said this month.
"This month's report is marked by the confirmation of a double-dip in home prices across much of the nation," said David Blitzer, chairman of the index committee at S&P Indices. "Home prices continue on their downward spiral with no relief in sight."
Blitzer said that since December 2010 an increasing number of markets had hit new lows. In March 2011, 12 cities – Atlanta, Charlotte, Chicago, Cleveland, Detroit, Las Vegas, Miami, Minneapolis, New York, Phoenix, Portland (Oregon) and Tampa – fell to new lows for the current housing cycle.
A rebound in prices seen in 2009 and 2010 was largely due to a tax credit for first-time home buyers, he said. Excluding that policy he said there has been no recovery or even stabilisation in home prices since the recession.

平板電腦 9.7吋與10.1吋 //7吋

7吋平板電腦具市場潛力


(中央社記者潘智義台北2日電)
根據集邦科技旗下研究部門WitsView預估,今年全球平板電腦出貨,88.6%將集中在9.7吋與10.1吋兩個尺寸上。
今年台北國際電腦展 (COMPUTEX)儼然就是平板電腦的大閱兵,除各大品牌競相推出相關產品外,過去以筆記型電腦為主要代工產品的系統廠,也在會場中展示一系列的原型機,希望藉此和有意投入平板電腦市場的客戶,建立起新的合作關係。
WitsView表示,由於終端消費者偏好大視野的平板電腦,9.7吋與10.1吋仍會是尺寸的主流,未來幾年市場占有率穩定維持在85%上下水準。
另外,7吋平板電腦因其獨特的成本優勢與尺寸區隔,同樣有機會發展成長銷型的產品。
WitsView研究協理邱宇彬指出,相較於9.7吋或10.1吋,7吋最大的競爭力來自於成本,平板電腦整機約有4成的成本比重來自於液晶顯示面板與觸控模組,由於7吋與10.1吋在這兩個關鍵零組件的報價上,皆有20至30%的差異。
換句話說,7吋平板電腦整機的成本至少比10.1吋低10%以上,7吋或以下尺寸十分適合做為低價平板電腦來推廣,透過價格帶向下延伸吸引更多消費者購買,有助於打開平板電腦的市場規模。
邱宇彬認為,7吋適切的大小也是發展的優勢,在平板電腦市場獨強的蘋果迄今都沒有推出9.7吋以外產品的計畫,對其他品牌來說,7吋等於在尺寸區隔上提供一個不與iPad正面衝突的選擇。
其次,7吋在可攜性與重量上取得不錯的平衡點,而上游面板等關鍵零組件的供應也十分成熟,適合填補現階段從5吋智慧型手機過渡到10.1吋平板電腦間所遺留下的尺寸缺口,發展成利基型產品。

2011年6月2日

RIM & 諾基亞 陷危機 against smartphone/Andriod trend

同病相憐 RIM諾基亞陷危機


(中央社台北2011年6月2日電)黑莓機製造商行動研究公司(Research In Motion Ltd. US-RIMM)股價重摔至2009年來最低水準,紐約投資公司Jefferies & Co.分析師密塞克(Peter Misek)警告,RIM不久將面臨與諾基亞 (Nokia OYJ FI-NOK1V)同樣的難題。
諾基亞1日削砍全年銷售與利潤預估值,股價聞訊跌趴至13年來低點。
密塞克指出,面對蘋果 (Apple US-AAPL)iPhone與採谷歌 (Google US-GOOG) Android平台的手機強勢出擊,加上諾基亞將轉換至全新作業系統平台,RIM飽受壓力。
米塞克表示:「諾基亞目前面臨的問題,RIM也不能倖免。」米塞克4月下調總部位在加拿大的RIM投資評等至「減碼」(underperform)評級。
RIM正力抗北美智慧手機市佔下滑劣勢,同時還面臨Android手機與蘋果iPhone需求持續擴增。與此同時,RIM黑莓機將採用去年甫購入的全新QNX軟體,並設法獲得PlayBook平板電腦的支援。RIM平板電腦PlayBook也採用QNX。
米塞克指出:「黑莓機的作業系統由OS轉換至QNX的過程中,RIM將遭遇與諾基亞相同的壓力與挑戰。」他將RIM股價目標設定在35美元。
RIM週三股價暴跌2.55美元或6%,收40.30美元,改寫2009年3月來低點,今年來RIM股價累跌31%。

WARNING::Cell phone use // cancer risk //WHO 神經膠質瘤,聽神經瘤 //手機與致癌風險

WHO: Cell phone use can increase possible cancer risk

By Danielle Dellorto, CNN
May 31, 2011 -- Updated 1749 GMT (0149 HKT)

(CNN) -- Radiation from cell phones can possibly cause cancer, according to the World Health Organization. The agency now lists mobile phone use in the same "carcinogenic hazard" category as lead, engine exhaust and chloroform.
Before its announcement Tuesday, WHO had assured consumers that no adverse health effects had been established.
A team of 31 scientists from 14 countries, including the United States, made the decision after reviewing peer-reviewed studies on cell phone safety. The team found enough evidence to categorize personal exposure as "possibly carcinogenic to humans."
What that means is they found some evidence of increase in glioma and acoustic neuroma brain cancer for mobile phone users, but have not been able to draw conclusions for other types of cancers
"The biggest problem we have is that we know most environmental factors take several decades of exposure before we really see the consequences," said Dr. Keith Black, chairman of neurology at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles.
The type of radiation coming out of a cell phone is called non-ionizing. It is not like an X-ray, but more like a very low-powered microwave oven.
"What microwave radiation does in most simplistic terms is similar to what happens to food in microwaves, essentially cooking the brain," Black said. "So in addition to leading to a development of cancer and tumors, there could be a whole host of other effects like cognitive memory function, since the memory temporal lobes are where we hold our cell phones."
Wireless industry responded to Tuesday's announcement saying it "does not mean cell phones cause cancer." CTIA-The Wireless Association added that WHO researchers "did not conduct any new research, but rather reviewed published studies."
The European Environmental Agency has pushed for more studies, saying cell phones could be as big a public health risk as smoking, asbestos and leaded gasoline. The head of a prominent cancer-research institute at the University of Pittsburgh sent a memo to all employees urging them to limit cell phone use because of a possible risk of cancer.
"When you look at cancer development -- particularly brain cancer -- it takes a long time to develop. I think it is a good idea to give the public some sort of warning that long-term exposure to radiation from your cell phone could possibly cause cancer," said Dr. Henry Lai, research professor in bioengineering at University of Washington who has studied radiation for more than 30 years.
Results from the largest international study on cell phones and cancer was released in 2010. It showed participants in the study who used a cell phone for 10 years or more had doubled the rate of brain glioma, a type of tumor. To date, there have been no long-term studies on the effects of cell phone usage among children.
"Children's skulls and scalps are thinner. So the radiation can penetrate deeper into the brain of children and young adults. Their cells are at a dividing faster rate, so the impact of radiation can be much larger." said Black of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center.
In February, a study by researchers at the National Institutes of Health, revealed radiation emitted after just 50 minutes on a mobile phone increases the activity in brain cells. The effects of brain activity being artificially stimulated are still unknown.
Neurosurgeon and CNN chief medical correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta says Tuesday's announcement, "dealt a blow to those who have long said, 'There is no possible mechanism for cell phones to cause cancer.' By classifying cell phones as a possible carcinogen, they also seem to be tacitly admitting a mechanism could exist."
Manufacturers of many popular cell phones already warn consumers to keep their device away from their body and medical experts say there other ways to minimize cell phone radiation.
The Apple iPhone 4 safety manual says users' radiation exposure should not exceed FCC guidelines: "When using iPhone near your body for voice calls or for wireless data transmission over a cellular network, keep iPhone at least 15 millimeters (5/8 inch) away from the body."
BlackBerry Bold advises users to "keep the BlackBerry device at least 0.98 inch (25 millimeters) from your body when the BlackBerry device is transmitting."
The logic behind such recommendations is that the further the phone is from the body, the less radiation is absorbed. Users can also use the speakerphone function or a wired earpiece to gain some distance.
Users can text instead of talk if they want to keep the phone away from their faces.
Finally, cell phones emit the most radiation when they are attempting to connect to cellular towers. A moving phone, or a phone in an area with a weak signal, has to work harder, giving of more radiation. So users can avoid using their cell phones in elevators, buildings and rural areas if they want to reduce their exposure, experts say.


WHO首度證實 手機與致癌風險有關

 更新日期:2011/06/01 11:33
過去多年來經常有報導說常用手機可能會有導致腦癌,現在世界衛生組織也證實,手機的確有致癌風險,就連手機業者也坦承,只要手機有傳送電波,不管是講電話還是發簡訊,至少要距離身體2公分以上比較安全。
手機對現代人來說幾乎已經是基本配備,就像穿衣服一樣自然,保守估計全球至少有五十億人口擁有手機,空氣中彌漫的手機傳送的電波,世界衛生組織說手機和致癌風險之間的確有關聯。
其實多年來一直有各種研究報告顯示常講手機可能導致腦癌,更有報導說男性將手機掛在腰間可能會影響生育能力,如今世界衛生組織又說手機與癌症之間有關聯性,但手機幾乎是現代人生活中不可或缺的工具,也因此專家建議民眾多利用耳機講電話或是用擴音效果,為了健康還是和手機保持距離以策安全。